From choosing the right licensing model to strategies for reducing costs and maximizing value
From choosing the right licensing model to Software Assurance — strategies to reduce costs and maximize benefits with SQL Server 2025.
SQL Server is Microsoft’s relational database management system, used worldwide to store, process, and analyze business data.
A new version is on the way—SQL Server 2025, currently in preview—with advanced features, from vector data types to deep Azure integration and native AI tools, suggesting rapid adoption in enterprise production environments.
To avoid being unprepared at the time of official release (General Availability), it is crucial to understand the licensing rules of the latest version and how they intertwine with those of previous releases.
As with previous versions, SQL Server 2025 also offers a range of editions designed to meet needs from small local development to complex enterprise environments.
Among the free options are the following:
To solve this inconsistency, SQL Server 2025 introduces two distinct Developer variants:
In this way, the generic “Developer” edition as we knew it until version 2022 is effectively split into two targeted editions, eliminating the risk of surprises or incompatibilities at release time.
For those requiring full functionality or operating with mission-critical workloads, the commercial editions make up the core offering:
If you want to explore the differences between version and edition, and understand how these concepts affect licensing, you can find all the details in our SQL Server licensing guide.
Once you’ve identified the most suitable edition, the next step is to understand which licensing model applies. The basic rules remain those already seen with SQL Server 2022, maintaining the same licensing structure.
The choice of licensing model mainly depends on the deployment scenario and user access patterns. In SQL Server 2025, the available models are:
As mentioned earlier, SQL Server 2025 retains the same core licensing rules as the 2022 release. Let’s look at some tips for optimizing license costs.
1) Evaluating cost impact
To choose the most suitable licensing model, it’s essential to evaluate its cost impact.
In the case of SQL Server Standard Edition, the Server + CAL model generally becomes more expensive than Per Core when the number of users exceeds around 30, considering the minimum of 4 cores required per physical processor or virtual machine.
This threshold becomes clear with an example based on the official SQL Server 2022 pricing (as the new edition’s pricing is not yet available):
Assuming 30 users:
Result: at around 30 users, the two models break even. Beyond that threshold, Server + CAL becomes increasingly expensive, since each new user adds about €198, while with the per core model the cost remains fixed.
2) Evaluating virtualization rights with SA
Beyond comparing models, it’s essential to consider virtualization rights, because with Software Assurance (SA) the cost dynamics change dramatically.
If you license all physical cores of a server with SQL Server Enterprise and have active SA, you get unlimited virtualization: you can run any number of SQL Server instances on virtual machines on the same host, without additional licensing costs for each VM.
Without SA, however, each virtual machine must be licensed separately based on the assigned virtual cores, with a significant economic impact in environments with many VMs.
This benefit makes SA a strategic choice in consolidation and virtualized-cluster scenarios, because it:
The annual cost of Software Assurance (SA) typically represents about 25% of the license price, but the benefits it provides can result in significant savings and greater operational flexibility. Referring to the official SQL Server 2022 price list, we can quantify more precisely:
In return for this cost, SA unlocks key benefits: unlimited virtualization in Enterprise, Azure Hybrid Benefit to reuse licenses in the cloud, license mobility to move them between hosts or to Azure without waiting 90 days, and version upgrades included.
We also discussed other optimization tips in another article, where we explored two often-overlooked areas. The first concerns licensable SQL components: installing only the truly necessary components (e.g., database engine, Analysis Services, or Reporting Services) on dedicated servers can reduce the number of cores that need to be licensed and thus lower costs.
The second relates to the specific rights in high availability and disaster recovery scenarios provided with SA, which allow passive instances to be maintained without additional licenses, provided they are used only for failover or periodic testing.
SQL Server 2025 brings important technological innovations but confirms most of the known licensing rules. This means that those who prepare in advance can build an optimized licensing plan today.
If during the planning phase you already know which licensing model to adopt and whether or not to opt for Software Assurance, you will reach the release date with a clear plan, a predictable budget, and the certainty of fully leveraging the economic and operational benefits of your investment.
At WEGG, we are experienced Microsoft licensing consultants (including SQL Server), so we can support you in calculating the exact SQL Server 2025 licensing requirements, selecting the most suitable model, and defining an optimization strategy to reduce costs and maximize benefits, both on-premises and in the cloud.
Insights
OUR OFFICES
OUR OFFICES
PADUA
Via Arnaldo Fusinato 42, 35137
MILAN
Viale Enrico Forlanini 23, 20134
ROME
Viale Giorgio Ribotta 11, 00144
Copyright © 2025 WEGG S.r.l. • P.I 03447430285 • C.F. 02371140233 • REA 311023
Azienda Certificata ISO 9001:2015 – ITA / ISO 9001:2015 – EN
Francesco Clabot
CTO WEGG e docente ITSM all’UniPD