Microsoft standardizes online service pricing: goodbye to discount levels in EA and MPSA contracts

What can be done to reduce the impact related to the removal of Price Level Benefits

In this article we analyze Microsoft’s latest move: the standardization of online services pricing in EA and MPSA contracts and the resulting elimination of discount levels. We’ll explore who will be impacted and what actions can be taken to reduce the effect of this change on IT costs.

For years, organizations subscribing to the Enterprise Agreement (EA) — Microsoft’s multi-year enterprise committed licensing contract (we’ve explained the various contract types elsewhere) — expected a significant advantage: the Price Level benefits, meaning lower unit prices as purchase volumes increased.

In recent years, however, Microsoft has progressively reduced these benefits, with the latest step announced in August 2025. Below is a timeline of the major changes:

  • 2017 – Removal of price levels for Azure. At the same time as a price reduction for some Azure plans, Microsoft aligned prices to those listed on azure.com, explaining that the change was intended to simplify the catalog and make it consistent across the various purchasing programs. Agile.it discussed it in this article.
  • 2018 – Elimination of Level A discounts. Microsoft removed programmatic discounts for Level A in EA/Select/Select Plus/MPSA contracts, effective October 1, 2018, causing a 3% increase for cloud services and a 4% increase for on-premises licenses. ITAM Review also discussed it at the time.
  • 2023 – New online services no longer benefit from waterfall pricing. In 2023 Microsoft implemented the change to offer all new Online Services at a single starting price, publicly available on the Microsoft website, as recalled by SHI Resource Hub, the blog of Microsoft partner SHI International.
  • From November 1, 2025 – Removal of discounts for levels B, C and D for Microsoft online services. Microsoft officially announced on August 12, 2025, that Online Services pricing will be aligned to Level A pricing for EA, MPSA and OSPA.

And that’s not all: earlier this year, Microsoft also announced that some customers will no longer be offered the option to renew the EA contract. We discussed it here.

With these changes, the gap between EA, Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) and Microsoft Customer Agreement for Enterprise (MCA-E) is narrower than ever.

What are Price Levels (A–D) and why they matter 

The EA model included four price levels, defined based on the number of licenses or committed users:

  • Level A: minimum threshold (250–2,399 users)
  • Level B: 2,400–5,999 users
  • Level C: 6,000–14,999 users
  • Level D: over 15,000 users

The official Microsoft page on the Enterprise Agreement indicates an overall discount between 15% and 45%, without specifying the breakdown by level. However, independent analyst benchmarks (e.g., Redress Compliance, 2025) estimate:

  • A ≈ 15%
  • B ≈ 20%
  • C ≈ 25%–35%
  • D ≈ 40%–45%

The advantage was significant because discounts applied to all licenses and services (waterfall pricing). Moving up a level meant achieving a general saving on the entire contract — this was the main reason many large organizations opted for EA: cost predictability, savings, and budgeting simplicity.

Who will be impacted, how and when 

Customers who currently benefit from lower prices due to belonging to Level B, C or D will, upon the next contract renewal or at the time of purchasing new online services not listed in the Customer Price Sheet after November 1, 2025, see their pricing realigned to Level A, meaning the public price indicated on Microsoft.com.

In practice, the cascading discounts that historically represented one of the main financial advantages of the Enterprise Agreement and the Microsoft Products and Services Agreement will be gone.

This move will have a significant impact especially on: 

  • Large companies currently enjoying substantial reductions on online services thanks to Levels C and D
  • Growing organizations that, upon renewal, would have reached higher discount levels

However, the following remain excluded from this change: the Education sector globally, U.S. Government, and customers who purchase only on-premises software.

What we can do 

If your organization is close to renewing an Enterprise Agreement (EA) or a Microsoft Products and Services Agreement (MPSA), and a significant part of your savings depends on price level discounts, now is the time to reassess your strategy.

From November 1, 2025, these benefits will no longer be available for online services: the pricing will be the same for all levels A–D. This means that if your current budget is based on reduced prices due to Level B, C or D, at the next renewal you may face an increase in unit costs.

To understand the impact, let’s take Microsoft 365 E3 as an example at the public price of €35.70 per user/month, where a company with 5,000 users would spend around €2.14 million per year without discounts. Here are the levels currently offered in EA considering average discounts:

  • Level A (≈ –15%): price €30.35, annual cost €1.82 million, savings €321,300
  • Level B (≈ –20%): price €28.56, annual cost €1.714 million, savings €428,400
  • Level C (≈ –30%): price €24.99, annual cost €1.499 million, savings €642,600
  • Level D (≈ –45%): price €19.64, annual cost €1.178 million, savings €963,900

In other words, for large organizations, moving from Level A to Level D could mean more than €600,000 in annual savings on just one service like M365 E3 — an advantage that, from November 2025, will no longer apply to online services.

At this stage, it is wise to: 

  • Analyze how much of your current savings depend on price level discounts and simulate cost scenarios for the post-November 2025 period.
  • Compare EA/MPSA carefully with alternatives like CSP, MCA-E or SPLA.
  • Optimize license usage: If part of the licenses are unused or, conversely, overused, corrective action can generate immediate and tangible savings. It’s not just about reducing numbers, but truly understanding how technology is used within the organization. That’s why it’s useful to conduct a functional analysis: identify who really needs certain tools and which features of the packages are actually being used. In many cases, the real value of Microsoft technology is not measured by the discount percentage obtained, but by the ability to align solutions to the real needs of users, thus maximizing return on investment. If you want to learn how to optimize some online services, check out the in-depth resources we’ve prepared on M365 or Dynamics.
  • Evaluate your room for negotiation with Microsoft or your partner, to reduce the impact of increases and lock in prices where possible, keeping costs under control.

At WEGG, we are consultants specialized in Microsoft licensing. We can help you reassess your EA or MPSA contracts, negotiate renewals effectively, and optimize license usage to reduce costs and maximize the value of Microsoft solutions within your organization.

02-s pattern02

Vorresti supporto nella valutazione dei contratti Microsoft? 

Contact us at [email protected] for a consultation!